Our portfolios provided positive performances for the month, starting the new financial year in a pleasing way.
Although inflation has come through strongly economically, recently deflationary concerns have resurfaced with the delta variant. The bond market remains unphased by inflation for now, perhaps anticipating its “transient” nature and an economic slowdown.
We remain concerned about medium-term economic prospects including the risk of stagflation, deflation without further stimulus, geopolitical risks, ongoing challenges to true profitability, and highly elevated market valuations, and are hence participating selectively in risk assets. The greatest medium-term challenge for all portfolios is probably achieving returns without suffering unduly in the continuing market crises; we are seeking to mitigate this risk in part by avoiding the worst of the market exuberance and greater alternatives allocations than most. We continue to see the need for strong active management to produce acceptable risk/return trade-offs.
We continue to look to diversify the portfolios where appropriate and sensible. We continue to believe some meaningful exposure to assets such as precious metals is essential as a hedge to navigate the coming months if governments continue to provide massive stimulus while huge geopolitical, social and economic issues persist. We note that economic and political risks remain very elevated globally and have recently attracted broader investor attention.
Our Cash Plus portfolio is very defensively positioned, while our Short-Term portfolio is relatively defensive, with both designed to be less volatile over shorter-term time periods than our longer duration portfolios.
Our more medium and longer-term orientated portfolios target returns and manage risk with longer-term time periods in mind. The Wealth Builder’s larger risk tolerance gives us most leeway to back higher risk assets on the basis of our insights and research, while still managing risk prudently over a longer-term time frame; it is in many ways a flagship portfolio for DAC and has – along with our other portfolios - proven highly competitive with both liquid retail and institutional portfolios of a similar nature. As active management has become more productive since COVID, we have seen a positive performance gap between us and our competitors.
Dynamic Asset’s portfolios are designed to be diversified, but focus on investing where return prospects are assessed as capable of meeting the return objectives of the funds over their respective time horizons. This diversification provides useful mitigation against risk over the appropriate time period consistent with each portfolio’s objective, while our active assessment of risk and return can target capital to where it appears most prospectively and appropriately placed. In this way, we are much more forward-looking than a historical SAA approach which tends to be more biased to what has happened (for example, by relying upon past correlations and volatility which may be markedly different from the future). We consider future scenarios actively and if there is a major regime shift, our approach should hence be much more capable inherently of adapting to different market conditions. That said, the market outlook remains challenging for everyone currently, no matter what the approach.
Extraordinary monetary and fiscal stimuli have been implemented by central banks and governments, creating distortions and market interference. The sheer size and extent of their actions are providing meaningful impacts on market returns and, in many cases, causing substantive dislocations from underlying company and economic fundamentals. Over time, we expect these policies to be very supportive for certain portfolio positions and require dynamic management of others. For example, and in particular, we hold meaningful weightings to ‘hard assets’ in different guises and continue to expect these to provide valuable return and risk contributions over time, even if they are occasionally volatile.
We believe large and unsustainable debt burdens, poor government policies and market interference continue to strangle real productivity growth for much of the economy, albeit nominal growth has markedly improved. This potentially bodes relatively poorly for traditional risk assets and index investing, upon which most traditional investment strategies and super funds are heavily dependent. Furthermore, we think good active managers will better be able to differentiate themselves and add value over the next few years, in part by being more nimble and able to differentiate between assets based upon their prospects in different economic circumstances and very disparate valuations.
We continue to be concerned about asset prices. We believe growth outcomes, geopolitical tensions and other risks and shocks pose further (unanticipated) risk to markets, potentially just as coronavirus has. Indeed, it may take a market shock to end the current market rally given many investors appear to have become entirely valuation insensitive in the face of massive stimulus. We hence think investors are best served by thinking outside the box in order to better protect and grow their capital, including potentially greater use of liquid value-adding alternatives (selectively chosen), discounted listed investment companies (selectively chosen and now more difficult to identify), along with precious metals exposures and greater weightings to real assets.
We aim to remain astute and flexible and highly risk-aware and are invested in liquid assets whose weightings we can adjust over time to respond to an ever-changing and potentially highly challenging investment climate.